AI Work FluencyEU AI Act glossary

Code of Practice Magatartási kódex (GPAI Code of Practice)

Verified: 2026-08-04 · Legal source: 53. cikk (4), 55. cikk (2), 56. cikk

Short definition

A code of practice — within the AI Act framework, best known in the form of the GPAI Code of Practice — is a legally non-binding soft-law document that serves as a voluntary means of demonstrating compliance pending the emergence of a harmonised standard. Signing it makes it easier for a provider to prove compliance, but non-signature is not, by itself, an infringement, provided the provider can present alternative, equivalent proof.

The legal basis is Article 53(4), Article 55(2) and Article 56. The GPAI Code of Practice was published on 10 July 2025, and is primarily relevant to providers of general-purpose AI models — not to companies that merely use the model — particularly for models with systemic risk, where it provides practical guidance for meeting the four additional obligations of Article 55. Signing the code is not the same as legal compliance: signature is a voluntary evidentiary tool that the authority accepts, but it does not replace the underlying legal obligation. If a provider does not sign, it must demonstrate, subject to individual regulatory assessment, that it achieves the same level of compliance by other means. This category rarely directly affects Hungarian SMEs in practice.

Why this matters for an EU SME

For a Hungarian SME this concept is mainly an orientation point: if a supplier AI model provider references having signed the Code of Practice, that is an accepted, but not exclusive, way of demonstrating compliance.

Need documented AI-literacy training?

Article 4 is a duty of diligence: what counts is not knowledge in the abstract, but demonstrable, documented effort. Our starter package lets you begin free.

Start free

Related terms

Related questions in the knowledge base (Hungarian)

This page is general information, not legal advice. It does not substitute for a legal assessment of a specific case and does not create a retainer or attorney-client relationship. The legal status was verified on 4 August 2026 against primary sources; where the law or regulatory practice is uncertain, this is flagged separately.