AI Work FluencyEU AI Act glossary

Provider Szolgáltató

Verified: 2026-08-04 · Legal source: 3. cikk 3. pont

Short definition

A provider is a natural or legal person that develops an AI system or a general-purpose AI model, or has one developed, and places it on the market or puts it into service under its own name or trademark, whether for payment or free of charge. Providers bear the Regulation's most extensive package of obligations: risk management, data governance, documentation, conformity assessment, CE marking.

The concept is defined in Article 3(3). The decisive test is placing the system on the market under one's own name or trademark — not where development physically took place, nor who wrote the code. The vast majority of Hungarian SMEs are not providers but deployers: they use a purchased or subscribed AI tool. A deployer can nonetheless become a provider through several routes: by offering a procured system under its own brand (white-labelling), by substantially modifying it, or by changing its intended purpose so that it becomes high-risk. For high-risk systems, providers carry the twelve-point obligation package of Article 16: risk management system, data governance, technical documentation, logging, quality management, conformity assessment, CE marking, EU database registration, and post-market monitoring. Two obligations, however, also apply to deployers: the AI literacy duty of Article 4 and part of the transparency rules of Article 50.

Why this matters for an EU SME

This is the costliest misunderstanding: a company that believes it is "just" a deployer because it uses a purchased tool can easily slide into the provider's obligation package if it brands, modifies, or repurposes the system.

Need documented AI-literacy training?

Article 4 is a duty of diligence: what counts is not knowledge in the abstract, but demonstrable, documented effort. Our starter package lets you begin free.

Start free

Related terms

Related questions in the knowledge base (Hungarian)

This page is general information, not legal advice. It does not substitute for a legal assessment of a specific case and does not create a retainer or attorney-client relationship. The legal status was verified on 4 August 2026 against primary sources; where the law or regulatory practice is uncertain, this is flagged separately.